1
The 2-year-old has been missing for four years now and the campsite where he was last seen was closed while crews searched …
source
6 comments
Like I said check at the place where they lived at get the dogs and go there please 🙏
After all this time and energy, the only thing anyone seems to know is that the boy vanished into thin air. None of the experts are proving to have any expertise.
Why do the Americans not pronounce vehicle properly?
Vehicles veehikles ????? The H is silent
THIS ALSO COMES CRASHIN INTO MY MIND AS I PONDER FURTHER: Why didn't this investigation find out what was going on in the lives of these people a month prior to this disappearance? so many things can be discovered just going back a month into the lives of these people. but you did fail in this du diligence. I see there are many other vids on this case, yet I cannot endure the thoughts of what a life this boy experienced while having the ill-fate of being born into its family. i'm crushed.
just watched hln case of this sad case. at the end the man says that his team received lots of critism. that he believes they investigated as thoroughly as could be. yet there were two things he DID NOT PRACTICE DUE DILIGENCE WITH, AS WELL AS THE LADY REPORTER: 1) The lady reporter correctly observes why would grampa be in that campsite with his ailments. she also fails to recognize that EVERY WOMAN KNOWS WHEN THEIR PERIOD WILL BEGIN AND WHEN TRAVELING ANYWHERE, BRINGS PROTECTION; PACKS IT FIRST EVEN, SO AS TO BE SURE SHE HAS IT. Also, not many would even go camping during their period, esp. the first two days. Why did she not bring protection, KNOWING her period would start very soon?2) the man reporter at end FAILS to ask sheriff why he would statethat only the four saw the boy when and if he already questioned THE MAN AT STORE and the sheriff said nothing came of that guy. BUT YOU DONT ASK THE SHERIFF IF HE ASKED THE MAN AT STORE IF HE CAN CONFIRM THE BOY [[WAS]] AT STORE. This would mean there were FIVE PEOPLE WHO SAW THE BOY, NOT ONLY FOUR. THE MAN IN THE STORE HAS NEVER SAID IF HE ACTUALLY SAW ANY BOY AT THE STORE BECAUSE THE SHERIFF AND REPORTER NEVER FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THIS PART OF INVESTIGATION. THAT POOR BOY NEVER STOOD A CHANCE.