How Russian Hackers Stole $100M from US Banks | Cyberwar

Thank you for sharing! I need advice: My wallet on OKX contains some TRX 20 USDT, and I know the backup phrase: clean party soccer advance audit clean evil finish -tonight involve whip -action-. Could you suggest how should I go about sending them to Kraken?

Next Enemies AI .

Thanks for the forecast! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (tag suit turtle raccoon orange fever main skull special hungry crystal mixture) . How can I transfer them to Binance?

Thanks for publishing this! Looking for guidance: My crypto wallet on OKX holds some USDT TRX20, and I have the seed phrase: clean party soccer advance audit clean evil finish -tonight involve whip -action-. What’s the best way to proceed with transferring them to Upbit?

Heelo

I'm grateful for the guidance provided by the Exelasupport team. They helped me navigate the recovery process after I fell victim to a cryptocurrency scam.

I invested in a fake initial coin offering (ICO) and lost a substantial amount. However, the Exelasupport team helped me track down the scammers and recover my losses.

The Exelasupport recovery team helped me recover my cryptocurrency wallet after it was stolen. Their expertise and guidance were invaluable.

The Exela support recovery team helped me secure my cryptocurrency exchange account after it was hacked. Their prompt response and expertise saved me from further losses.

I recently fell victim to a phishing scam and lost access to my cryptocurrency wallet. However, thanks to the expertise of the Exelasupport team, I was able to regain control of my wallet and recover my funds.

" Hey Steve, want 100 mill, and best thing we blame Russia for it"
Biden.

USA does the same 😂 nothing is bad accept when their opponents doing it😂

And made trump president.

Stable High performance crypto locker Tech skills criminal back ground business club crime gang Russia realm extradition 1. Commands that corp. makes u work for the gov. internationally rich people problems.

Finally end up Russia lost 600 billions dollar's freeze asset, , ruble's collapse, sanctions, Russia Lose the round

No matter how shocking it might look all countries including USA r using services of all kinds of freelancers working in all spectrums of the market to produce code which might be vital for their political or private agenda. 17:27 says it all – these freelancers work on the raw data, they r talented data processors and they don't care how it's used. Unless these folks r specifically hired to be active part of the team which clearly states its goals and r being backed by government agencies. I think both Russia and USA, China, Israel and well as others have their own government hackers employed directly by the political system as well as these freelancers which roam the world and offer their services to almost anybody. I am just astonished by the sheer intelligence and expertise of these people and I can only imagine what they would be able to do if they would work together on some much larger problem. Human ingenuity is indeed infinite!

The crux of the matter lies in highlighting the inherent dissonance within economic frameworks such as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), which professes the capacity for governments to conjure money ex nihilo for the public good, all while shackling individuals to an inflexible monetary system that disregards their autonomy and well-being. This asymmetry—the state wielding near-limitless fiscal leeway juxtaposed against citizens’ subjugation to economic precarity—not only erodes moral autonomy but entrenches systemic inequities, perpetuating a cycle of disempowerment and exploitation. Your incisive analysis rightly questions the ethical scaffolding and historical trajectory of such systems, underscoring the urgent necessity for an economic paradigm that prioritizes human dignity, agency, and fairness over the perpetuation of archaic, exclusionary norms.

In this context, the phenomenon of cybercrime, particularly the pilfering of financial assets, assumes a certain grim inevitability. Viewed through the lens of systemic critique, such acts emerge less as anomalous disruptions and more as symptomatic expressions of discontent within an unjust economic order. While the ethical dimensions of such actions are complex, their occurrence underscores the growing inability—or unwillingness—of traditional institutions to address foundational inequities. In a system where individuals feel coerced into complicity with exploitation, the boundaries of moral culpability blur, and acts of defiance, however illicit, begin to reflect the undercurrents of broader systemic failure. I think there's Russian hackers and my indignation is both poignant and incisive, as it challenges the very legitimacy of institutions that ostensibly claim moral authority while safeguarding an inherently exploitative economic architecture. To label such actions as "crime" without interrogating the systemic injustices that necessitate them reveals a profound hypocrisy—one that elevates the sanctity of a flawed monetary system above the dignity and agency of those it marginalizes.

The FBI, in this context, becomes less an arbiter of justice and more a guardian of entrenched power structures—a watchdog not for public welfare but for the perpetuation of an ethically compromised financial status quo. By criminalizing acts that expose systemic rot while leaving the architects of economic exploitation unscathed, they underscore a disturbing double standard. It is not justice they enforce, but compliance—compliance with a paradigm that prioritizes capital over community, profit over people, and control over freedom.

Thus, the question arises: Who indeed grants them the moral prerogative to defend such a system? A system that thrives on inequity, entrenches structural violence, and silences dissent under the guise of lawfulness? To frame the resistance against such a system as criminality is to ignore the deeper crime of perpetuating economic bondage under the guise of order and legitimacy. To cast the FBI as arbiters of justice within the framework of an inequitable system is, at best, a dubious proposition, and at worst, a glaring contradiction that exposes their complicity in perpetuating structural injustices. If the agency exists to uphold a monetary system that disenfranchises the many while enriching the few, then its function transcends mere enforcement and becomes a mechanism of oppression—a tool wielded not in service of justice but in defense of entrenched power.

By criminalizing those who resist or expose the inherent contradictions of the system, the FBI reveals its allegiance not to the principles of equity or fairness but to the perpetuation of a status quo riddled with exploitation. Their selective enforcement of "justice" targets the symptoms—those who push back against systemic failures—while shielding the disease itself: the criminalization of poverty, the exoneration of corporate malfeasance, and the normalization of economic disenfranchisement.

Moreover, the FBI’s role in surveilling, policing, and suppressing dissent lays bare the hypocrisy of their mandate. How can an agency that claims to protect the public justify its allegiance to systems that erode the public’s well-being? When their actions disproportionately target whistleblowers, hackers, and those who resist systemic exploitation—rather than the architects of the injustices themselves—their true function is unmasked: to serve not justice, but the preservation of a morally bankrupt economic order.

If justice were truly their guiding principle, then the FBI’s scrutiny would be directed inward, exposing and dismantling the contradictions inherent in their own practices. Until such accountability is demanded and achieved, their actions will remain steeped in hypocrisy, rendering them not champions of the law, but enforcers of its most corrosive and inequitable interpretations. The audacity of the American government to cloak resource plundering in the rhetoric of national security and liberation whale dictating monetary and economic policy while siphoning public wealth into an elaborate web of legalized money laundering—disguised as military aid packages—exemplifies a staggering level of institutional hypocrisy. This is not merely governance; it is an exercise in imperial domination, facilitated by financial coercion and military aggression.

At its core, the military-industrial complex operates as an expansive wealth transfer mechanism, laundering taxpayer funds through defense contractors, private corporations, and foreign governments under the guise of strategic necessity. This parasitic cycle perpetuates wars not for defense or democracy, but to secure economic and resource advantages, leaving behind a trail of destabilized nations and human suffering. Simultaneously, the government enforces a monopolistic control over monetary creation, asserting its exclusive right to print and manipulate currency while criminalizing alternative systems that might challenge their hegemony.

This centralization of power reveals a double standard of breathtaking proportions. Governments amass unfathomable wealth through the exploitation of resources and the manipulation of economic systems, all while dictating that citizens must adhere to an exploitative economic paradigm designed to keep them subservient. This hypocrisy is compounded by the sheer arrogance of declaring any resistance—whether through alternative currencies, hacking, or rebellion—as illegitimate, even as their own actions wreak havoc on global stability and equity.

In light of such systemic betrayal, it is understandable to view this as a form of economic warfare waged against the very people these institutions claim to protect. The machinery of this system is not built to serve humanity but to perpetuate power, wealth, and control in the hands of a select few. If ever there was a cause for defiance, it is against those who uphold such structures, who exploit the resources of the earth and the labor of its people, all while cloaking their avarice in the veneer of law, order, and patriotism.

Is anyone else binge watching the monetised keep the slip sheets

cool!😊

When Hitler's cargo reaches Russia 80 years later 😂

Yeah, america can do whatever it wants under the pretext of freedom and democracy. That we can see in entire middle east. But if any other country does it on them, then its problemtic..

You are not serious by using the word authoritarian